mgh said:Well most women like that comfortable feeling of protection that most men naturally offer, especially to the women they love. As for physically weaker, it would be a slight turn off if for example, i can lift a pack of water or something, and he really can't. It just makes a woman feel less womanly, because here she is, doing something more masculine than her own husband/boyfriend. Not only does it take away from his manhood, but it also takes away from her womanhood, and that's why personally to me, it would be a turn off, but im not completely opposed to the idea, because for all i know the guy (who is physically weaker than me) might be the most sweetest man and the best thing to ever happen to me. then, i guess, my emotions and feelings would overwhelm the fact that he is physically weaker than me, and i'd look past it and possibly begin a serious relationship. hopefully that answers ur question...
thanks for just being honest and answering the question proposed. Thank you for not assuming where i was going with my question and just answering based on what the question asked, not what it implied in the reader's mind.
Baklawa and peaches: the question was simple. Would you get in a serious relationship with a man who you're physically stronger than? Physically stronger...that's it! I'm not saying the guy is a douche or that he's not protective. I'm saying a man who you could beat up if you wanted to. Would you be with such a man?
As for peach's example of most guys not being attracted to butchy women, i fall in that category. I'm programmed to like fit girls who are slimmer in build, so, i wouldn't be attracted to butchy women. I wouldn't be with a stronger woman b/c i don't find them attractive. I'm sure evolution has played a role in this decision, but i'm certain that genetics certainly has. Add to this, everything i've taken in, be it from the media or from personal experience, i've found fit girls to be bonerific, whereas butchy ones are not.
